Low wages, tax credits and the distress of a poorer service - cabin
crew tell ‘The Truth’ behind the BA dispute
26th January 2010
Low wages, reliance on tax credit top-ups and the distress of
being forced to deliver a poorer service to passengers are the real
reasons behind the BA dispute, says the airline's cabin
crew.
The issues are highlighted in a video released today (Tuesday) by crew
and their union, Unite, who have jointly produced the film in order
to set the record straight about the causes of the current
dispute.
According to Unite, the 13,500 crew have been grossly
misrepresented by their employer. One of the major
distortions, challenged in the video, is that the crew are highly
paid. In truth, around 75 per cent of all crew do not earn more
than £20,000 per year. In fact, as the video shows, so poorly
paid are many of the crew based at Gatwick that many of them rely
on second jobs or Working Family Tax Credits to top up their
earnings to a level where they can support their
families.
One crew member speaking on the video has been working as cabin
crew for over five years at Gatwick. He said: “I take home
around £1,100 a month and I’m still entitled to Working Tax Credits
because we’re classified as low paid workers, and that’s common
among most of the main crew at Gatwick. Many of us have two
jobs in order to pay our bills – often in bars and restaurants – to
make ends meet."
Yet, despite the low earnings of the majority, crew still
offered to make pay and conditions’ sacrifices in order to deliver
around £100 million year on year in savings for the company, on the
condition that BA committed to maintaining a high standard of
passenger service. This offer was rejected by the company.
Crew also reveal that the consequent cut in crew numbers - down
by between one and three people on all flights, and reduced by 25
per cent on European flights - is having a negative impact on
passengers. A customer service director with BA for 17 years said:
“Now BA has reduced the number of cabin crew on each flight it’s
having a terrible impact on service. My job is now to serve
meals in Club World, but I’m also the only one on board who is
trained to work the in-flight entertainment system, and solve any
problems that are escalated. I can’t do both at the same time
and passengers are being left in the lurch.”
The distress caused by the airline's refusal to negotiate
changes but to instead impose them is also taking its toll.
One crew service director, with British Airways for 25 years, says
that as a manager, she: “... thought BA was a company that we could
sit down and talk with and thrash things out, but to actually have
something imposed on you and be told if you don’t like it then you
can leave is not very nice."
Len McCluskey, Unite assistant general secretary, who is leading
talks to resolve the dispute, said the film would help set the
record straight: "For those who want to understand the truth behind
this dispute this film shows why crew have been driven to consider
industrial action for the second time in as many months. Low
wages, the stress of working under imposed changes and the distress
of cutting corners on passenger service have pushed them to this
point.
"These are dedicated professionals, men and women who care for
their company and want it to succeed. Most employers would
give their proverbial right arm to have a staff resource of this
quality and commitment, not trash it through distortion or attempt
to cow it with threats to take revenge if they strike.
"Now the truth is there of all to see, BA must move on from
attacks on its crew to negotiating a secure settlement and a future
for this airline."
Unite is leading the fight against imposed changes which have
cut crew numbers by between one and three onboard all flights and
forced through changes to in-flight service delivery. The
ballot opened on January 25th and will close on February
22nd. Unite represents more than 12,000 of BA's 13,500 cabin
crew.
ENDS
Notes: While the film was made in conjunction with BA
crew, Unite has distorted their images and replaced their voices
with those of actors for fear that crew may be targeted at work for
their participation.
Email to a friend